The Pulse - May 2026

Keep your finger on it

In partnership with

The pulse is a monthly online newsletter summarizing key literature curated for the hospitalist/inpatient provider. Given the brevity, this is not meant to supplant reading primary literature independently.

Greetings Readers! In this monthly edition, we examine 3 practice changing studies.

Help keep this newsletter free by exploring the link to our advertising partner this month, found at the bottom of this email.

  1. Sepsis Gets Personal: SSC 2026 Trades Dogma for Nuance

    The 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines continue the slow pivot away from rigid protocolization and toward individualized resuscitation strategies. High-confidence shifts include moving away from qSOFA in favor of more sensitive screening tools like SIRS and MEWS, adopting age-conscious MAP targets (with lower targets [MAP >60] reasonable in older adults), and endorsing a more flexible approach to antibiotic timing — reserving the “within 1 hour” urgency primarily for shock or clearly probable sepsis. The guidelines also reinforce that fluids still come first for most hypotensive patients, though simultaneous vasopressors are acceptable in unstable shock, reflecting ongoing uncertainty rather than doctrinal certainty. Perhaps the most practice-changing addition is the recommendation to actively de-resuscitate after stabilization, acknowledging that the real danger sometimes begins after the fourth liter. Overall, the update reads less like a new gospel of sepsis care and more like critical care finally admitting that patients stubbornly refuse to follow algorithms. Prescott HC et al. Crit Care Med 2026 April

    Study Type: Surviving Sepsis Campaign updated guideline

    Link

  2. CAP and Gown: When 3 Days of Antibiotics May Be Enough

    In a target trial emulation of more than 55,000 hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia, carefully selected low-risk patients who achieved clinical stability by hospital day 3 did just as well with 3–4 days of antibiotics as with traditional ≥5-day courses. Mortality, readmissions, and C. difficile rates were essentially identical, suggesting that for some CAP patients, “clinically stable” may matter more than “day five.” The catch: only about 10% of patients met eligibility criteria. Still, the study adds fuel to the growing antimicrobial stewardship movement that shorter can be smarter — provided the patient looks better, thinks clearly, and vital signs have stopped auditioning for a rapid response call. The era of “finish the full week because we always do” continues to lose ground to individualized, physiology-driven care. Doumat G et al. Annals Int Med 2026 April

    Study Type: observational emulation of a target trial including 5,620 hospitalized (non-ICU) patients with CAP across 67 Michigan (USA) hospitals. Original data set included 55,000+ patients but only 10.1% met inclusion criteria, suggesting generalizability limitations. Study also funded by insurance company (Blue Cross Blue Shield)

    Link

  3. Not All Clots Are Created Equal: Rethinking DVTs from the Waist Up

    The American Venous Forum has finally given upper-extremity DVT its own clinical identity, recognizing that treating arm clots like leg clots is anatomically tidy but etiologically naive. The 2026 guidelines establish three distinct subtypes — venous thoracic outlet syndrome–associated, catheter-associated, and non–catheter-associated DVT — each requiring a tailored diagnostic and management approach. Notably, D-dimer testing earns a split decision: useful for ruling out non–catheter-associated DVT (sensitivity >90%) but unreliable in catheter-associated cases (sensitivity ~50%), where it should be abandoned in favor of duplex ultrasound. Treatment centers on oral Xa inhibitors for a minimum of three months, with first-rib resection recommended for thoracic outlet syndrome cases and anticoagulation continued three months post-catheter removal. While the evidence base remains modest, these guidelines represent a meaningful step toward more precise, anatomically-informed venous management. Malgor RD et al. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2026 July.

    Study Type: new guideline from the American Venous Forum

    Link

Where to Invest $100,000 Right Now, According to Experts

Investors face a dilemma. When the S&P 500 finished its worst quarter since 2022 last month, diversifiers like bonds and bitcoin fell too.

Even with the turnaround in mid-April, analysts at Goldman Sachs and Vanguard have projected low-single-digit annualized returns from 2024-2034.

Bloomberg asked where experts would personally invest $100,000 for their March monthly edition.

One answer that surfaced for a second time? Art.

It's what billionaires like Bezos and the Rockefellers have privately used to diversify for decades.

Why?

  1. Appreciation. The ArtPrice100 Index outpaced the S&P 500 overall from 2000 to 2025

  2. Low-correlation. The postwar contemporary segment has moved independently of traditional investments like stocks since ‘95.*

  3. Resilience. A scarce, physical, and global asset class with decades of demonstrated demand.

Thanks to the world's premier art investing platform, now anyone can invest in works featuring legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso, without needing millions.

Shares in new offerings can sell quickly but...

*According to Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. See important Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.

Thank you for reading! If you enjoyed this newsletter, please consider sharing with your colleagues.